1) Watt DL, Rosenfelder C, and Sutton CD The effect of oral irrigation with a magnetic water treatment device on plaque and calculus J Clin Periodontol 1993 May;20(5):314-317
Abstract
Calculus formation on tooth surfaces is analogous to the formation of lime and scale deposits in plumbing. Magnetic water devices have been shown to significantly reduce scale deposits in industry; therefore an oral irrigator with a magnetic water device may have a similar effect on calculus. To test this hypothesis, a double-blind clinical study was established using 64 irrigators, 30 of which had their magnetic devices removed. 54 patients with heavy supragingival calculus were given irrigators at random after prophylaxis. Instructions were given to irrigate twice a day, particularly the lower 6 anterior teeth. The patients were also told not to floss these 6 teeth which were to be the study teeth. They were examined after 3 months and measurements were taken of the accretions adhering to the study teeth. No attempt was made to determine whether the adhering material was hard or soft so it must be assumed that at least some of the measured material was also plaque. The measurements of the group using an irrigator with a magnetic device showed a 44% greater reduction in calculus volume (p < 0.0005) and a 42% greater reduction in area (p < 0.0001) over the group using an unmagnetized irrigator. There appears tobe a statistically significant difference in supragingival accretion volumes between conventional irrigation and using an irrigator with a magnetic water treatment device.
2) Boyd RL, Hollander BN, Eakle WS Comparison of a subgingivally placed cannula oral irrigator tip with a supragingivally placed standard irrigator tip J Clin Periodontol 1992 May;19(5):340-344
Abstract
This study compared the depth of irrigation of periodontal pockets achieved by a cannula subgingival irrigator tip and a standard oral irrigator tip. They were tested on periodontally involved teeth recommended for extraction from 17 patients. Before extraction, reference grooves were made circumferentially in each study tooth at the level of the gingival margin. In one group of 5 patients (29 teeth), a cannula was inserted halfway into the pocket at the facial, mesiofacial, distofacial, lingual, mesiolingual and distolingual surfaces and the surface irrigated for 5 s at 5 psi with a solution of plaque-staining dye from an oral irrigator. A 2nd group of 7 patients (29 teeth) was tested similarly with a standard irrigating tip at 80 psi. A 3rd (control) group of 5 patients (26 teeth) rinsed with the dye solution. Teeth were then extracted. The distance on each tooth from the reference notch to the apical extent of the stained plaque, and also to the coronal limit of the connective tissue attachment, was measured at 4 sites (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual) under a dissecting microscope to determine the extent of dye penetration. Mean linear penetration for the control group was only 0.1 mm. Irrigation with the cannula tip penetrated farther into both the medium (3.5-6 mm) and the deep (greater than 6 mm) periodontal pockets (p less than 0.01) than did irrigation with the standard tip.
3) Attarzadeh F
Water irrigating devices for the orthodontic patient
Int J Orthod 1990;28(1-2):17-22
Abstract
Fixed orthodontic appliances increase the number of retention areas, resulting in increased possibilities for the accumulation of dental plaque. In addition, there is a risk of direct mechanical irritation. In spite of good toothcleaning most orthodontic patientsdevelop generalized moderate gingivitis or an edematous type within one to two months after the placement of the fixed orthodontic appliances. Since the gingival changes represent a reaction to the bacterial plaque products rather than to the orthodontic forces; the only way to control them is by effective oral hygiene. Braces and banded teeth have many tiny recesses that a toothbrush and other cleaning aids have difficulty reaching. For good oral hygiene, these should be kept free of food debris. Water irrigating devices irrigates these hard-to-clean areas to remove food and other debris. Pulsating jets of water very gently lift the free gingiva to rinse out crevices. The water irrigator also pulses into areas between teeth and gums to flush out trapped food and debris. Water irrigating devices cannot by any means be regarded as substitutes for more effective plaque-removing methods, such as tooth-brushing and flossing; rather, they should be considered as an adjunct to the total oral hygiene program.